What is An Ignition Interlock?

Posted on by
Comments

If you have been arrested for a DUI, you may need to install an ignition interlock in your car as part of your punishment.

An ignition interlock is installed in the steering column of your car. In order to start your car, you must blow into the device and if the device detects alcohol, your car will not start. Additionally, you will be required to take rolling re-tests while on the road. The device itself looks no bigger than a cellphone.

It is an offense to tamper with the device or get someone else to blow in the interlock for you. In fact, many interlocks will soon come with a camera to ensure the correct person is utilizing the device. Furthermore, if you fail to install the device and get pulled over again, you can find yourself in a serious amount of trouble.

While many people find interlocks to be a bit of a nuisance when they’re on the go, at the end of the day, they are lucky to be able to drive. Not being able to drive tends to be a bigger hassle. With an ignition interlock, you can fulfill your sentence and learn to be more responsible on the road while still being able to carry on with your life.

A company that makes ignition interlocks, Smart Start, has just launched a few new state-based ignition interlock sites. If you live in Oregon, California, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut or Rhode Island, be sure to check out how you can find an interlock in your state and the specificities of your states’ interlock laws.

Leandra's Law 101 with Attorney Jeffrey J. Jowdy

Posted on by
Comments

Leandra’s law goes into effect in New York within a few days and I know many New York drivers feel in the dark about the new law and how it will affect them. The law will now make it a felony to drive drunk with a minor in the car as well as require anyone with a DWI offense to install an ignition interlock device.

With any new law, there are certain complexities that arise. To provide some insight, we have New York and Connecticut attorney Jeffrey J. Jowdy to explain how he feels about the law and how it can affect you.

RK: Have any of your clients been required to use ignition interlocks before? How did they react?

JJ: I have had a number of clients who have had to install ignition interlocks on their motor vehicles. After the initial shock my clients have come to accept the device as necessary for being able to maintain the ability to transport themselves without relying upon others or public transportation.

Initially the cost was a very large factor in how they reacted, but since costs of the devices and the monitoring services that issue is not as severe as it was a couple of years ago.

I have had clients with pending cases install the device as a way to improve their cases while they were pending. I have found this to be a useful tool in negotiating pleas.

Unfortunately however, the Departments of Motor Vehicles that we work with are still having difficulties in issuing conditional licenses that require ignition interlock devices. I am sure that when the new law goes into effect next month those difficulties will decrease.

RK: How do you think Leandra’s law will affect your cases in the future?

JJ: There will be a substantial affect on any case involving minor passengers. In the past cases like this were dealt with using risk of injury to minor type penal laws. Now that there is legislation specific to these cases that creates a felony for any offender, it will make cases more likely to go to trial and severely limit plea negotiations.

Anytime a new “crime” is created by the legislature, it is significant.

RK: Do you feel Leandra’s law is fair or do you find it too harsh?

JJ: I understand the position of the legislature in cases such as this and do believe that legislation specific to DWI charges involving minor passengers was needed. I think that making the charge a felony regardless of other extenuating circumstances is too harsh.

Anytime new legislation like this is created I often wish that it is done with varying degrees within the offense itself. I believe that there should be accelerated penalties for those who commit this offense with any prior DUI/DWI conviction on their record and that there should be more flexibility in dealing with First Time DWI/DUI offenders who find themselves charged with violating Leandra’s Law.

RK: What do you think the most important information NY drivers should know about Leandra’s law?

JJ: Obviously, the most important element of the law is that it is a felony to drive with a BAC over .08 with a passenger under 15 years old or younger.

.08% BAC is not a very high threshold and the fact that mere operation is now a felony, NY drivers should be even more mindful of their alcohol intake when they know that they will be transporting minors.

RK: Do you think Connecticut will follow in the same fashion as other states and update their ignition interlock law to require anyone with a DUI offense to have one?

JJ: At this time I am not aware of any plans for the State of Connecticut to update their DUI legislation to include ignition interlock devices.

The way Connecticut has set up its DUI laws does make for an easy transition should they wish to make an ignition interlock device mandatory however.

For first offenders, the Law requires that the offender’s Connecticut License or their Privilege to drive in Connecticut be suspended for a period of one year. Any requirement for an ignition interlock device can accompany this suspension. Moreover, since people who plead to DUI offenses in Connecticut usually have a prior arrest for DUI, legislation such as this might provide offenders with an ability to drive when it may not have existed previously.

For more information on Jeffrey Jowdy and state DWI laws, you can visit his New York page or his Connecticut page.

The Smart Start of New York website  has useful information and can help you find an ignition interlock in New York.

Ignition Interlocks 101

Posted on by
1

Attention Californians!

Posted on by
Comments

There is a law going into effect today that requires anyone with a DUI conviction to install an ignition interlock in their car.

Did you know that over 200,000 Californians get a DUI a year? Therefore, this new law is going to affect a lot of drivers. If you have been arrested recently, this law will likely affect you, too.

An interlock is installed into the steering column of your car. It looks no bigger than a cellphone. In order to start your car, you must breathe into the interlock. If it detects alcohol on your breath, your car will not start.

If you are interested in more information, I would check out the Smart Start of California website. It has a lot of details about interlock technology and a comprehensive analysis of the new CA ignition interlock law.

Photo of an ignition interlock.

Photo of an ignition interlock.

Many CA Residents Continue to Drive During License Suspension

Posted on by
Comments Off

In many DUI arrests, there are frequent cases of the driver operating a vehicle with a suspended license. We know that there are many repeat offenders, but in California the number of people who drive with a suspended license is quite immense.

According to the Ventura County Star, 180,000 Californians currently have their license suspended. An estimated 70,000 of those people continue to drive.

Why does this happen? Why do so many drivers believe they can slip through the cracks of the legal system?

According to California state law, driving on a suspended license is only a misdemeanor. Therefore, it takes a low priority in comparison to other crimes. Police do not do as many sweeps to monitor if people are driving illegally.

Above all, people (especially in California) need to drive to get to work and take care of other responsibilities. With California’s new ignition interlock law beginning its testing phase in July, we could see a decrease in those numbers. Time can only tell.

Department of Transportation Teams up with DADSS

Posted on by
Comments Off

Ray LaHood, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, announced on his blog today that the National Traffic Safety Association along with the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety have created a partnership with an alcohol detection research program known as Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety, or DADSS.

According to their website, DADSS aims to “research, develop, and demonstrate non-invasive in-vehicle alcohol detection technologies that can very quickly and accurately measure a driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BACs).” DADSS wants to avoid the use of ignition interlocks and create a device that would be used by society as a whole – not just convicted drunk drivers.

LaHood considers DADSS’ research to be a huge undertaking. After all, this organization is trying to create technologies to prevent drunk driving without being obtrusive to a person’s daily life. As of now, three companies are developing prototypes to be tested at Harvard Medical School.

If DADSS does create a device that is used by most drivers in the future, what kind of changes will we see to DUI laws? Will they be more lenient? Or could they become harsher than ever?

Advancing Interlock Bills in Multiple States

Posted on by
Comments Off

At the end of last week, Vermont and Tennessee both saw advances their proposed ignition interlock bills.

The Vermont House of Representatives approved Representative Eldred French’s ignition interlock bill. Not only will this proposed law reduce fatalities on the road, offenders who opt for an ignition interlock could possibly pay less in civil fines and see reductions in their license suspension.

In Tennessee, Representative Tom Shipley’s ignition interlock bill gained approval from the House Budget Subcommittee. Shipley’s bill beat out a competing bill by Representative Henry Fincher, despite Fincher’s bill being supported by the TN chapter of MADD.

[Sources: Times Argus and Timesnews.net]

PA Bill to Avoid Loophole

Posted on by
Comments Off

I reported last week about a legal loophole that allowed for a DUI offender not to be convicted for a second time since her first conviction had not happened yet. Apparently, this is an issue in many states.

This week, PA representative Seth Grove’s bill was approved by a state House of Representatives Committee. The bill allows people arrested for a second DUI to be considered repeat offenders even if they have yet to receive their first conviction.

There are many supporters of this bill, including the PA chapter of MADD. Ultimately, it will keep roads safer and make people more accountable for their actions.

The bill has yet to be approved by the PA House and Senate. Following the possible approval, the bill will be sent to Governor Ed Rendell.

[Source: York Dispatch]

M.A.D.D. Oversight in Nevada

Posted on by
Comments Off

Last year, the Nevada traffic safety office gave M.A.D.D. a $20,000 grant to educate judges and prosecutors about ignition interlock devices. However, the information M.A.D.D. shared was only in regards to first and second DUI offenses and not DUI felonies.

M.A.D.D. representative Keely Hedderman never spoke with judges or prosecutors about the law that requires DUI offenders to have an ignition interlock device for three years if they have killed or injured someone. She was only looking at first and second offenses and not felonies.

Because of this oversight, Nevada did not renew the grant. M.A.D.D. was unaware of this oversight, as well.

Do you think Hedderman was still being effective with just informing judges about first and second DUI offenses? What do you think this oversight means for M.A.D.D. and the reputation of Nevada’s DUI enforcement?

[Source: The Reno-Gazette Journal]

Prospective Harsher Penalties for Repeat DUI Offenders in Colorado

Posted on by
Comments Off

This past Friday, Colorado’s House passed a bill that would create harsher penalties for repeat DUI offenders.

Sponsored by Representative Claire Levy, House Bill 1347 includes a minimum prison sentence of ten days after a second DUI or DWI. For a third DUI, the offender faces 60 days minimum in prison.

The bill also includes a provision that will now require judges to issue ignition interlock devices, along with the offender being required to make periodic court visits and allow government monitoring of their drug and alcohol usage.

[Source: State Bill Colorado]

Is Minnesota Lagging Behind the Rest of the Country When it Comes to DUI Laws?

Posted on by
Comments Off

In an article in the Star Tribune, writer Richard Meryhew looks at Minnesota’s state drunk driving laws versus other state laws and finds that Minnesota is very behind the curve.

In the state of Nevada, there was a case where a drunk driver who killed a bystander received ten years in prison. In a similar case in Minnesota, the driver received only one year in prison.

Rarely are DUIs considered a felony in Minnesota, even for repeated offenders. Only if a person is killed can a DUI offender be convicted of a felony, as past rulings have indicated.

Unlike many of other states, Minnesota does not have sobriety checkpoints. In fact, in 1994 the state Supreme Court ruled sobriety checkpoints unconstitutional. Minnesota uses saturation patrols, which Meryhew claims are very ineffective.

Many states issue worse penalties for drivers who have a Blood Alcohol Level of .15 or above at the time of arrest. Minnesota issues these penalties if a person’s BAC is 0.20 or above. Some of the penalties other states issue include requiring drivers to use an ignition interlock device. A proposal by Minnesota’s governor Tim Pawlenty to require ignition interlock devices is still being debated in committee.

Why isn’t Minnesota influenced by the drunk driving laws of other states? If Minnesota were to toughen its laws, what consequences do you think will occur?

Update: Maybe an ignition interlock bill is closer than we think, according to this article.

New Arguments Against Harsher Maryland Drunk Driving Laws

Posted on by
Comments Off

Chairman of a Maryland House Panel, Joseph F. Vallario, has found new evidence to help him fight his case against Maryland’s tougher DUI laws. Maryland has taken centerstage in the world of DUI laws, as the prospective rulings have caused a much heated debate.

The prospective bill would require first-time DUI offenders to have an ignition interlock device, no matter what their BAC level was at the time of arrest. Vallario and his proponents have argued that this is unfair to first-time DUI offenders who are barely above the legal limit and have responsibly paid for their crime. (The legal limit is .08 in the state of Maryland.) Vallario has been fighting to have the law state that ignition interlocks should be required to first-time offenders who have a BAC of .15 or above.

As the hearings come to a close, Vallario has found more evidence to strengthen his objections. First is a study by the Wine Spirits and Wholesalers of America that states that the average blood alcohol level for most fatal accidents is .18. The second piece of evidence is the fact that only 11 states require ignition interlocks after the first DUI no matter what the BAC level, whereas 27 states issue ignition interlocks to offenders with .15 or above. These arguments, along with arguments from the License Beverage Distributors and Maryland defense lawyers, seem to be the key to victory, according to Vallario.

Additional Details in the New MD Ruling

Posted on by
Comments Off

Maryland’s DUI Laws have been the center of attention for many citizens. Recently, Maryland has become another state to require courts to issue an ignition interlock after a first DUI offense.

According to the “Getting There” column in the Baltimore Sun, the senate quickly passed the ignition interlock bill. However, the House Judiciary Committee is expected to pass this bill with adjustments. Originally, the bill stated that if a person has a BAC level of 0.08 or above, they would need an ignition interlock in order to drive. However, the House Judiciary Committee is attempting to amend the bill by requiring ignition interlocks only for perpetrators who have an extremely high BAC level.

Although this is most likely to outrage members of MADD and other proponents, columnist Michael Dresser says that the House Judiciary Committee had their reasoning. “[The] General Assembly can always come back and strengthen the law but…it wouldn’t ever have the option of dialing it back – even if it proved unworkable.”

For additional information on MD DUI Laws or if you are in Maryland and need help with your DUI case, contact an attorney today.

Maryland Senate Approves Ignition Interlock Device

Posted on by
Comments Off

The Maryland Senate has approved a bill to issue an ignition interlock device to a first time DUI offender. This is only a preliminary approval and WBAITV.com reports that the House Judiciary committee has yet to bring up the bill, but the Senate will most likely pass it on Thursday, March 25th.

Like other states, Maryland is issuing ignition interlock devices after hearing of some shocking statistics. A third of Maryland drunk drivers continue to drive after their license is suspended. Furthermore, many first time DUI offenders have admitted to driving drunk numerous times before their arrest.

The American Beverage Institute has objected to this ruling. They claim that issuing the interlocks after one offense is too harsh of a punishment. However, Maryland lawmakers insist that this measure will prevent a lot of drunk-driving deaths on Maryland’s highways. If you’re based in Maryland and need help with a current DUI, contact attorney Andrew D. Alpert today.

Nevada resurrects Advisory Coalition on Impaired Driving

Posted on by
Comments Off

After a series of communication issues with handling drunk driving cases, Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto has decided to bring back the Advisory Coalition on Impaired Driving. The coalition had not been meeting much in recent years, but is now back in full force after the Reno Gazette-Journal reported problems of Nevada handling drunk driving cases.

Some of the issues in the Reno Gazette-Journal included judges not following the law requiring them to issue interlock devices to people convicted of a DUI. The journal also reported the DMV giving licenses to offenders before their suspension deadline.

Now that it is reinstated, Special Deputy Attorney General Brett Kandt says he hopes the coalition can include more key members such as representatives from the courts, DMV, DOC, and Parole and Probation. With this, he hopes to dramatically reduce the number of drunk drivers in Nevada. If you are dealing with a DUI arrest in the state of Nevada, a DUI attorney is here to help.

Kentucky Bill would require ignition interlock devices for DUI convictions

Posted on by
Comments Off

Kentucky House Bill 58 was passed out of the House budget committee Wednesday.   If the bill becomes law, anyone convicted of a Kentucky DUI must install the device and must blow into the device each time he/she wishes to drive the vehicle. The car will not start if the device detects alcohol on the driver’s breath.

Although somewhat cumbersome, ignition interlock devices allow drivers to continue going to work, family obligations and church – as long as he or she isn’t drinking.

Numerous states, including New Mexico, currently have similar laws.  As a result, repeat DUI offenses are down 65 percent and deaths due to drunk drivers have decreased 35 percent.

If you have been arrested in Kentucky for DUI, contact an attorney immediately to get information about Kentucky DUI laws.